Samim anghaie trial

Many of the counts were dismissed because of a statute of limitations on them had run out, and a jury acquitted the two on other counts. However, they were convicted in February of wire fraud allegations and submitting false information to obtain contracts from MASA and the U. Air Force. Samim was sentenced to six months in prison, and Sousan was sentenced to six months of home confinement.

They also falsely described the number of employees at NETECH and its relationship with the University of Florida while submitting invoices for labor hours allegedly completed by employees who had not actually done so, the report says. Lastly, the defendants submitted stolen research information that had been produced by UF graduate students, other professors and a Russian laboratory, the report says.

Password at least 8 characters required. Confirm Password. Law may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest. We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy. Law takes your privacy seriously. Sign In. Law The Practice of Law. Law Pulse Business of Law. District Court for the Northern District of Florida.

Stay ahead of the curve In the legal profession, information is the key to success. Access to case data within articles numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more. Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc. Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more! Since , Hamid Anghaie, who lives in Tampa, has been director and vice president of the company.

Before Hamid took over, his father had the post, according to court documents. Authorities said the Anghaies took advantage of two federal grant programs set up to stimulate technological innovation in the private sector and strengthen the role of small businesses. Under the NETECH name, they "submitted multiple fraudulent certified contract proposals to NASA, in order to receive the maximum funding for proposed research contracts," according to court documents.

The couple allegedly submitted fraudulent invoices to reimburse payments to "alleged employees," which ultimately resulted in the government overpaying the company, the documents say. Based on those fact findings, which are fully supported by the evidence, we agree with the district court's determination that none of the Appellants were harmed or prejudiced in any way by the conversation and their motions for a new trial was were due to be denied.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case.

Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case. Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.